Google

Tuesday, June 5, 2007

TOP TEN RICHEST PERSONS IN THE YEAR 2007

29
Top 10 World’s Richest People, 2006 -or- Sticky Wealth

Back in 2004, I learned something that surprised me: 8 of the 10 world’s richest people were Americans. This is more than I thought there would be. But that didn’t strike me as hard as this then did: 7 of the 10 world’s richest people came from only 2 companies. Can you guess which companies? Not too hard when you think about it. Wal*Mart (WMT) had 5 and Microsoft (MSFT) had 2. Here are theDollars-Money-Wealth.jpg Top 10 world’s richest people from 2004 (courtesy Forbes.com):

  1. Bill Gates
  2. Warren Buffett
  3. Karl Albrecht
  4. Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Alsaud
  5. Paul Allen
  6. Alice Walton
  7. Helen Walton
  8. Jim Walton
  9. John Walton
  10. S Robson Walton

The fact that only 2 companies created such phenomenal wealth astounds me. Even though the Waltons’ wealth is inherited, the sheer combined volume of it ($100 billion vs. $46 billion for Bill Gates) is almost unfathomable. Then I thought, what wealth has stuck around until 2006, two years later? Who are the Top 10 world’s richest people in 2006? Again, Forbes.com provides us the answers:

  1. Bill Gates
  2. Warren Buffett
  3. Carlos Slim Helu
  4. Ingvar Kamprad
  5. Lakshmi Mittal
  6. Paul Allen
  7. Bernard Arnault
  8. Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Alsaud
  9. Kenneth Thompson & family
  10. Li Ka-shing

A few things stick out to me from this year’s list:

The Waltons have fallen out of the Top 10 (though they are still in the Top 20). Since 2004, the Waltons’ combined wealth has decreased to from $100 billion to $79 billion, while Bill Gates’ has increased to from $46 billion to $50 billion.

Gates just keeps staying on top! He’s been the world’s richest person for 10 of the last 11 years.

Finally, only 2 of the 10 are Americans. The others represent Central America, Europe, the Middle East, and the Far East. The riches of the world are seemingly becoming more globally distributed. I say this is a good thing for the world—perhaps it is the indication of an increasingly interconnected global economy.

No comments: